<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jake Wharton &#187; C#</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jakewharton.com/category/programming/csharp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jakewharton.com</link>
	<description>Programming, Freelance Web Design, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 22:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>pyy + C# = pyysharp?</title>
		<link>http://jakewharton.com/2009/07/25/pyy-plus-csharp-equals-pyysharp/</link>
		<comments>http://jakewharton.com/2009/07/25/pyy-plus-csharp-equals-pyysharp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 06:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jake Wharton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[C#]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jakewharton.com/?p=369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Advances in C#&#8217;s syntax almost allow for a rudimentary implementation of pyy to be created. Comparatively, it is much uglier, less useful, and more of a pain to program than its Python counterpart which is why I doubt a functional C# version will ever become a reality.
Are there any advantages to using something like pyy [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jakewharton.com/2009/07/25/pyy-plus-csharp-equals-pyysharp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
